🧠 RNN vs DNN for Time Series Forecasting

Created by Dr. Pedram Jahangiry | Enhanced with Claude

Understanding RNN vs DNN for Time Series

This interactive visualization demonstrates a critical concept in time series forecasting: Dense Neural Networks (DNNs) can work well on raw time series data by treating lags as independent features, while Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) require data preprocessing to effectively capture temporal patterns.

Using the classic airline passenger dataset, you'll see how DNNs achieve good performance on raw data, while RNNs initially struggle but excel after log transformation and differencing (making data stationary).

Key Learning: Model choice matters, but so does understanding what preprocessing each architecture needs!

🤔 What's Going On? Is RNN Failing?

Note that the Dense Neural Network (DNN) model works well on the unprocessed airline passenger data, even without preprocessing steps like differencing or logarithmic transformation, while the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) requires these preprocessing steps to perform effectively.

This can be attributed to several factors related to the nature of DNNs and how they process information compared to RNNs:

📊 DNNs and Feature Representation

🔄 RNNs and Sequential Data

💡 Conclusion

Configuration

🔧 Shared Configuration

Raw Data
Log + Differencing
100

🔷 DNN Configuration

12
32
16

🔶 RNN Configuration

12
16